The rugged, resource-rich landscape of Balochistan, Pakistan’s largest yet most sparsely populated province, has been a cauldron of simmering discontent for decades. Since the very inception of Pakistan in 1947, a potent yearning for self-determination has fueled a persistent Baloch separatism movement. At the forefront of this struggle stands the Baluchistan Liberation Army (BLA), a militant nationalist organization that has increasingly asserted its presence through armed insurgency. Understanding the complex tapestry of historical grievances, political marginalization, and economic exploitation is crucial to grasping the enduring nature of this conflict.
Who are the BLA Fighters?
The BLA, a name that resonates with the aspirations of a segment of the Baloch people, publicly announced its existence in 2005. Its debut was marked by a bold rocket attack on a paramilitary camp in Kohlu, Balochistan, coinciding with a visit by the then President Pervez Musharraf. This act served as a clear declaration of their objective: to wage an insurgency aimed at achieving Baloch self-determination and establishing an independent homeland for the Baloch ethnic group.
The fighters of the BLA primarily comprise individuals from various Baloch tribes who believe that armed struggle is the only viable means to achieve their political aspirations. Their motivations stem from a deep-seated sense of historical injustice, perceived economic exploitation of their resource-rich land, and cultural marginalization within the larger Pakistani state.
The Historical Roots of Baloch Nationalism
While the BLA’s armed insurgency has gained prominence in the last two decades, the underlying currents of Baloch nationalism and demands for political autonomy stretch back much further. The seeds of discontent were sown in 1947 during the partition of British India and the creation of Pakistan. The Khan of Kalat, who held sway over the princely states of Kalat, Lasbela, Kharan, and Makran, initially sought to maintain independence. However, this aspiration was short-lived. In March 1948, the Pakistan Army forcibly annexed Kalat, a move that ignited the first sparks of armed resistance and a sense of betrayal that continues to fuel the Baloch nationalist movement.
The 1970s witnessed another significant chapter in this tumultuous history. Inspired by the liberation of Bangladesh, a leftist guerrilla movement emerged in Balochistan, advocating for greater autonomy. The government led by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto responded with military force between 1973 and 1977, attempting to quell the uprising. Although the tribal sardars, who had initially spearheaded Baloch nationalism, were later co-opted by the state, the underlying grievances remained.
The insurgency experienced a resurgence in momentum from 2006 onwards. A pivotal event that galvanized the Baloch nationalist sentiment was the killing of Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti, a revered Bugti sardar who had previously served as both Chief Minister and Governor of Balochistan, by the Pakistan Army. His death became a rallying cry for various Baloch separatist groups, further intensifying the armed struggle.
Factors Fueling the Current Momentum
Several factors have contributed to the current heightened momentum of the Baloch insurgency. The Pakistan Army’s extensive operations against Baloch nationalists over the past two decades have been marked by widespread allegations of human rights violations, including hundreds of enforced disappearances. These actions have deepened the alienation and resentment among the Baloch population, pushing more individuals towards armed resistance.
Furthermore, Baloch nationalists view the increasing presence of jihadist groups in the province with suspicion. They perceive this influx as a deliberate strategy by the Pakistani security establishment to counter their nationalist demands by creating internal divisions and undermining their movement.
International developments have also played a role. In 2012, the US Congress held a hearing specifically on Balochistan, signaling a degree of international attention to the Balochistan issue and, to some extent, supporting the demand for a free Baloch land. A significant shift in India’s policy was observed in 2016 when Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his Independence Day speech, made a direct reference to the Baloch freedom struggle. This statement, while not amounting to direct support, provided a morale boost to Baloch separatist aspirations and further strained relations between India and Pakistan.
The Strategic Significance of Balochistan
Balochistan’s geographical location and its rich natural resources underscore its strategic importance. Bordering both Afghanistan and Iran, the province holds significant geopolitical value. Its population, predominantly tribal, is known for its secular principles and a historical affinity towards India.
Economically, Balochistan is the most resource-rich of Pakistan’s four provinces, boasting substantial deposits of gas, oil, copper, and gold. Despite comprising nearly half of Pakistan’s total land area, it accounts for a mere 3.6% of the country’s population. This disparity fuels a sense of injustice among the Baloch people, who feel that their resources are being exploited by the central government without adequate benefits accruing to the local population.
Pakistan has consistently alleged that the Baloch insurgency is supported by India, a claim that New Delhi has neither confirmed nor denied. The case of Kulbhushan Jadhav, a former Indian Navy officer who Pakistan claimed was abducted from Iran and charged with espionage for supporting Baloch activism, further exemplifies the complex geopolitical dimensions of the conflict. Additionally, numerous Baloch activists have reportedly sought asylum and applied for Indian citizenship, adding another layer of tension to the already strained relationship between the two neighboring countries.
The BLA’s Focus on Chinese Interests
The BLA has increasingly targeted Chinese nationals and projects in Balochistan, explicitly stating that these attacks are a response to Beijing’s perceived disregard for Baloch sovereignty. The BLA maintains that China has entered into deals and agreements concerning Balochistan without the consent or benefit of the local population, viewing the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as a neo-colonial endeavor aimed at exploiting their resources.
The Gwadar port, a deep-water port strategically located near the Strait of Hormuz and a central component of CPEC, is a key point of contention. The Baloch people fear that these large-scale projects will further marginalize them, alter their demographic composition, and deprive them of their ancestral lands and resources. The security of Chinese nationals in Pakistan has become a significant concern for Beijing, particularly since the inception of CPEC. The BLA’s attacks have demonstrably stalled progress on various CPEC projects, highlighting the security challenges associated with the initiative.
The Significance of Recent Events: The Train Hijacking
Recent events have marked a concerning escalation and a shift in tactics employed by Baloch separatist groups. The BLA’s recent train hijacking of the Jaffar Express, carrying over 400 passengers, underscores the group’s growing audacity and capacity to execute complex operations. The rebels’ demands for the release of Baloch political prisoners and civilians allegedly abducted by state forces, coupled with the threat to blow up the train, highlight the desperation and intensity of their struggle.
The siege, which lasted approximately 30 hours, resulted in the tragic deaths of at least 21 passengers and four security personnel, along with the killing of 33 rebels by Pakistani forces. This incident represents a significant turning point, demonstrating the willingness of Baloch militants to engage in high-stakes operations targeting civilian infrastructure and putting numerous lives at risk to achieve their political objectives.
The Evolving Tactics: The Deployment of Female Suicide Bombers
A particularly alarming development has been the BLA’s deployment of female suicide bombers. The recent attack carried out by a highly educated woman and mother of two marks a rare instance of a non-jihadist ethno-nationalist group adopting this tactic, reminiscent of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri Lanka. This shift in strategy signals a potential radicalization within the Baloch movement and a willingness to employ more extreme measures. Security experts familiar with the Baloch insurgency view this development as a clear indication of a worsening security situation in Pakistan.
Pakistan alleges that the training camps for these militants are located in Afghanistan. If these allegations are accurate, the incident could also suggest a decline in Pakistan’s influence over the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, potentially providing a safe haven and operational space for Baloch separatist groups.
The Core Grievances: Exploitation and Marginalization
At the heart of the Balochistan conflict lie deep-seated grievances of exploitation and marginalization. The Baloch people vehemently allege that their abundant natural resources are being extracted and utilized by the central government without adequate compensation or benefits trickling down to the local population. This perceived economic injustice fuels significant ethnic discontent and profound anger towards the Pakistani state.
The historical narrative of broken promises and forced accession further exacerbates these feelings of alienation. The initial acceptance of Kalat’s independence by Pakistan’s founder, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, followed by its subsequent forceful integration, is viewed as a betrayal that continues to resonate deeply within the Baloch collective memory.
Jinnah’s Betrayal: A Foundational Grievance
The circumstances surrounding Balochistan’s accession to Pakistan remain a critical point of contention. Initially declared an independent state comprising the princely states of Kharan, Makaran, Las Bela, and Kalat, the Khan of Kalat, Mir Ahmed Yar Khan, opted for independence while the other three acceded to Pakistan.
Historian Dushka H Sayyid notes that Kalat, unlike Kashmir or Hyderabad, was geographically peripheral and thus did not feature prominently in the initial contest for the accession of princely states. Jinnah himself initially acknowledged Kalat’s independent status, fostering a sense of trust with the Khan.
However, this initial understanding was short-lived. Faced with pressure from the British, who feared the instability of an independent Kalat bordering expansionist regimes, Jinnah reversed his stance. In October 1947, he urged the Khan to expedite the merger with Pakistan. Despite the Khan’s refusal, Jinnah announced the accession of Kharan, Makaran, and Las Bela in March 1948, effectively landlocking Kalat and significantly reducing its territory.
Compounding this, false reports alleging the Khan’s desire to join India further inflamed tensions. Without international support, the Khan of Kalat was ultimately left with no choice but to accede to Pakistan, a decision that laid the foundation for decades of resentment and the ongoing Baloch struggle for independence. As Taj Mohammad Breseeg writes in his book ‘Baloch Nationalism: Its Origin and Development up to 1980’, the Pakistani authorities employed a campaign of coercion and prepared for a forced merger of the state.
Recurring Rebellions: A History of Resistance
The forced accession of Kalat was not the end of the story. The history of Balochistan within Pakistan has been punctuated by several significant rebellions, each fueled by a sense of marginalization and a yearning for autonomy.
The second rebellion erupted in 1954 following Pakistan’s implementation of the “One-Unit plan,” which merged the Balochistan States Union with the provinces of West Pakistan in 1955. This move was perceived as an attempt to further erode Baloch identity and autonomy, deepening the feelings of neglect and deprivation, as noted by Breseeg. In 1958, the Khan of Kalat at the time, Nawab Nauroz Khan, declared independence but was subsequently tricked into surrendering in 1959. Mir Ahmad Yar Khan Baluch, in his book ‘Inside Baluchistan’, quotes Khan’s poignant description of his surrender and the subsequent humiliation and violence he witnessed.
The third major uprising occurred in 1963, led by Sher Muhammad Bijrani Marri, known as General Sherof. This rebellion demanded the withdrawal of Pakistani troops, the cancellation of the One-Unit Plan, and the restoration of Balochistan as a unified province. The conflict ended in 1969 when General Yahya Khan assumed power and signed a truce. A year later, the One-Unit Plan was abolished, and Balochistan was recognized as one of Pakistan’s four provinces.
The Bangladesh Impact and the 1970s Uprising
The independence of Bangladesh in the 1970s served as a powerful inspiration for Baloch nationalists, emboldening them to demand greater autonomy. However, Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s refusal to concede to these demands triggered widespread protests, leading to the dismissal of the Akbar Khan Bugti-led provincial government in Balochistan in 1973.
Pakistan responded with a large-scale military operation to suppress the protests, resulting in an armed uprising that pitted thousands of Baloch tribesmen against the Pakistani military. This intense conflict lasted for four years until Bhutto’s deposition by General Zia-ul-Haq. Subsequently, the Baloch rebels were granted amnesty, and Pakistani troops were withdrawn from Balochistan.
The fifth major conflict commenced in the mid-2000s, sparked by the alleged rape of a female doctor in a Baloch town by military personnel. This incident ignited widespread outrage and further fueled the Baloch nationalist movement. The conflict has intensified in recent years, marked by increasingly deadly attacks on security personnel and infrastructure projects. Despite the persistent unrest and the deep-seated grievances of the Baloch people, there has been no indication of the Pakistani government agreeing to their demands for greater autonomy or independence.
The Unending Struggle
The train hijacking by the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) represents the latest chapter in the long and bloody history of the Baloch struggle for freedom. The south-western province of Balochistan remains one of Pakistan’s most significant security challenges, a testament to the unresolved historical injustices, economic disparities, and political marginalization that continue to fuel the flames of Baloch separatism. The cycle of rebellion and suppression has persisted for decades, with no clear end in sight, highlighting the urgent need for a comprehensive and just resolution to address the legitimate grievances of the Baloch people and ensure lasting peace and stability in the region.
Read more: Terror Attack in Pahalgam
Baloch separatism refers to the ongoing movement in the Balochistan province of Pakistan where a segment of the Baloch people are striving for self-determination and the establishment of an independent homeland, separate from Pakistan.
The killing of Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti, a respected Baloch leader, in 2006 served as a major catalyst, galvanizing the Baloch insurgency and leading to a significant increase in its momentum.
Baloch nationalists allege that the Pakistan Army’s operations in the region have resulted in numerous enforced disappearances and other human rights abuses, further fueling resentment and support for separatist movements.
They believe that the influx of jihadist groups is a deliberate tactic by the Pakistani security establishment to counter Baloch nationalist demands by creating internal divisions and weakening their movement.
Prime Minister Modi’s reference to the Baloch freedom struggle marked a notable shift in India’s policy, providing a morale boost to Baloch separatists and adding a new dimension to the geopolitical dynamics of the conflict.
The BLA claims that these attacks are a response to China’s perceived disregard for Baloch sovereignty and its involvement in projects like CPEC without the consent or benefit of the local Baloch population, viewing it as neo-colonial exploitation.